The Trump administration is now paying companies to give up renewable projects.

View in browser
Support our nonprofit journalism

Climate Desk Newsletter

STORIES FROM MOTHER JONES AND ITS PARTNERS

Earlier this week, at the CERAWeek energy conference in Houston, the Interior Department and the French oil supermajor TotalEnergies unveiled a very strange settlement. The Trump administration announced that it would give Total almost $1 billion to scrap its proposed offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean, and in exchange Total would invest around $1 billion in US oil and gas projects.

 

Many climate activists and media outlets described this settlement as the government deploying taxpayer money to get a company not to build something, and the Trump administration itself almost seemed to invite that interpretation. The truth, as my Grist colleague Rebecca McCarthy and I point out in our story this week, is a little weirder. The Interior Department has already tried to cancel five almost-complete offshore wind farms in the Atlantic, and has lost in court on all five attempts. If the administration were to cancel other leases like Total’s, the courts would likely order it to pay out the leaseholders. The nearly $1 billion payment to Total is the exact amount Total paid to lease the ocean territory in the first place. In that sense, it represents a preemptive admission of legal defeat by the government.

 

The project’s cancellation doesn’t do much to change the picture for offshore wind. Major companies like Total already view the US offshore wind sector as uninvestable thanks to Trump’s animus—a future president who wants to rebuild the industry was already going to be starting from zero. If more companies take government settlements to give up their leases, that just means Interior will have to auction them off again in some future administration—likely with some legal guarantee against arbitrary future cancellations. The Northeast still needs offshore wind to meet growing power demand, and at some point the market will return.

 

As for the oil and gas projects Total promised to fund, that’s yet another smokescreen. The company had already made a “final investment decision” on its liquefied natural gas facility in the Gulf of Mexico and was already pouring billions into new offshore oil production well before the Interior Department got involved. Multinational oil companies are a lot of things, but one thing they are not is unscrupulous with their money. They tend to make decisions based on financial outcomes, not political browbeating. As Bob Dylan said, you don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.

 

Check out our reporting on the administration’s latest shell game.

—Jake Bittle

 

Advertisement

Mother Jones Donations Ad
TOP STORY
Two men wearing suits and ties handshake while smiling.

RONALDO SCHEMIDT/AFP/GETTY

Trump’s $1 Billion Payoff to Stop Offshore Wind Is Even Stranger Than It Sounds

The government is paying TotalEnergies to halt a renewables project it isn’t building in exchange for fossil fuel investments it’s already making.

GRIST

 

SPONSORED CONTENT BY THE MIT PRESS

 

Clearing the Air: A Hopeful Guide to Solving Climate Change (AVAILABLE NOW)

Clear, simple answers to the most common and vexing questions about climate change that we can take action on right now.

 

“One of the clearest explanations of the climate challenge I’ve read.”

—Bill Gates

 

“A refreshingly pragmatic and undoomy book.”

—The Guardian

 
TRENDING

A massive solar project blooms in California

CANARY MEDIA

 

Here's how the Iran war may affect the world's transition to clean energy

THE GUARDIAN

 

Where there’s wildfire smoke, there’s poor mental health

UNDARK

 

The search for the perfect snail snack

BIOGRAPHIC

Advertisement

Mother Jones Subscriptions Ad
EDITOR'S PICK
Massive, long, cylindrical orange buoys float on the edge of a river

MICHAEL GONZALEZ

An Eyesore Runs Through It

US Customs and Border Patrol has launched an audacious plan to install floating barriers along 536 miles of the Rio Grande. What could possibly go wrong?

INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS

 

HELP CLIMATE DESK THRIVE

 

This Is Reader-Supported Journalism

Climate Desk is a collaboration of more than a dozen news outlets covering the most essential environmental issues of our time. But great journalism isn’t cheap. Mother Jones, which oversees Climate Desk, is a nonprofit, as are many of our partners. You can help keep our collaboration going, and bringing you timely stories on every aspect of the crisis, from business and politics to culture and science.

 

We encourage you to subscribe and donate to our partner publications, and to support Climate Desk directly by giving to Mother Jones. Our coverage relies on readers like you stepping up at this critical moment. You needn’t be a rich philanthropist—quite literally, every dollar helps. We appreciate your support.

Donate

Did you enjoy this newsletter? Share it on Facebook and Bluesky.

Climate Desk
Donate Subscribe

This message was sent to michaelamechanic@gmail.com. To change the messages you receive from us, you can edit your email preferences or unsubscribe from all mailings.

For advertising opportunities see our online media kit.

Were you forwarded this email? Sign up for Mother Jones' newsletters today.

www.climatedesk.org
PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755