Donald Trump has finally gotten what he has desired for years: a deal with Vladimir Putin. The arrangement he reached with the Russian dictator...
 
FREE TRIAL VERSION. DON'T MISS OUT.

FREE TRIAL VERSION. DON'T MISS OUT.

FREE TRIAL VERSION. DON'T MISS OUT.

FREE TRIAL VERSION. DON'T MISS OUT.

 

Trump and Putin: Together at Last

By David Corn  October 17, 2026

President Donald Trump greets Vladimir Putin on the tarmac at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025. Sergey Bobylev/Sputnik via AP

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin meet at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, in August 2025. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

 

You're reading a free promotional version of Our Land, and we hope you enjoy David's exclusive writing and don't want to miss out on what's next. Sign up to start receiving a free 30-day trial of Our Land and enjoy all of the behind-the-scenes reports and interactive features with each issue.

Start My Free Trial
 

Donald Trump has finally gotten what he has desired for years: a deal with Vladimir Putin.

The arrangement he reached with the Russian dictator—the United States will temporarily put aside sanctions on Russian-exported diesel fuel and Russia will supply millions of tons of diesel to the global market—has widely been dismissed by oil industry experts. The amount of diesel involved is a mere drop in the worldwide bucket, and its sale is unlikely to do much to lower the price of diesel in the United States, which is a net exporter of diesel. Trump’s idiotic war in Iran remains the main cause of higher oil prices.

But this agreement is tremendously significant, for it marks the culmination of both Trump’s decade-long effort to embrace Putin and Moscow’s decades-long effort (or operation) to cultivate Trump as an ally and useful idiot. Moreover, it has brought about a moment that was inevitable: Trump fully siding with the Russian tyrant and taking steps to betray Ukraine, a democratic ally.

The president of the United States has now bear-hugged an autocrat and accused war criminal who has been assisting Iran’s efforts to kill American service members and who for the past 10 years has been waging his own shadow war of disinformation and influence operations and cyberattacks against the United States and the West. Trump is helping this foe collect more oil revenue, and, at the same time, he’s denigrating Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and pressuring him to surrender to Putin. Trump is providing aid and comfort to the enemy.

Advertisement

Ten myths about American politics

This is no shocker.

Since the late 1980s, Trump has sought to strike a deal in the Soviet Union or Russia, as Russian money flowed into assorted projects of the Trump Organization in the United States and elsewhere. Soviet and Russian officials dangled the possibility of joint ventures before Trump in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, yet nothing materialized. Then in 2013, Trump held the Miss Universe contest in Moscow. He netted about $2 million from the venture, while his partner—an oligarch close to Putin who underwrote the pageant—lost about $10 million. Essentially, this was a transfer of wealth from one of Putin’s plutocrats to Trump. More important, when Trump announced the contest would be held in the Russian capital, he asked if Putin, a repressive thug, would become his “new best friend.” From that point on, Trump repeatedly signaled he yearned to be a Putin BFF.

Following the Miss Universe contest, Trump once again tried to score a big development project in Moscow—but Putin’s illegal annexation of Crimea got in the way of that endeavor. Yet that did not stop Trump. While campaigning for president in 2015 and 2016, as he spoke positively of Putin, he secretly pursued a massive Moscow Trump Tower project, negotiating with Russian businessmen with suspected ties to Russian intelligence. He never bothered to tell voters about this side gig that ultimately did not come to pass. He even claimed he had nothing to do with Russia. A lie.

As a presidential candidate and then as chief executive of the United States, Trump aided and abetted Putin’s covert assault on the 2016 election—which was mounted by Putin in part to help Trump win the White House—by ceaselessly and loudly echoing Putin’s denials. With his constant braying that the Trump-Russia scandal was a “hoax” and “witch hunt” orchestrated by the Deep State, the Democrats, and the media, Trump has provided cover for a foreign adversary that has attacked American democracy repeatedly.

During his first stint as president, Trump defied his advisers and strove to be supportive of Putin, such as when he urged the G-7 nations that had kicked Putin out of the G-8 following his seizure of Crimea to welcome the Russian back. Or when he tried to muscle Zelenskyy to open an investigation to whip up evidence proving the bonkers conspiracy theory that Ukraine had somehow orchestrated the Russia scandal. He told aides that he had learned of this plot from Putin. That move to absolve Putin—twinned with his effort to force Ukraine to manufacture evidence of corruption related to Joe Biden—led to Trump’s first impeachment.

In 2020, Trump even helped spread derogatory disinformation about Biden that, according to his own administration, had been cooked up by a Russian intelligence operation. The president of the United States assisted Putin’s assaults on American elections.

For at least 13 years, Trump has displayed a deep and bizarre affinity for Putin, as I chronicle in my latest book, How Russia Won: Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and the Fight for America. During his first term in the White House, this was a source of profound puzzlement for Trump’s top national security aides. Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats wondered whether the Russians had something on Trump. There has been widespread speculation on this possibility. My take (in brief): The Russians might indeed possess compromising material on Trump—though not a “pee tape”—but Moscow has not had to use any of it. Trump has not been coerced into his man-crush on Putin.

Fiona Hill, who handled the Russian portfolio at the National Security Council at that time, concluded that when Trump gazed at Putin he saw an incredibly wealthy autocrat who possessed total authority, and he longed to emulate all of that. Trump has repeatedly displayed his affection for dictatorial rulers. But amid his stanning for other tyrants—Kim Jong Un, Xi Jinping, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi—his mooning over Putin stands out.

During his first administration, as has been widely noted, Trump was surrounded by advisers who constructed various guardrails. Consequently, he was not free to forge the bond with Putin that he wished for. The second time around, he’s not encumbered in this fashion. It was only a matter of time before he would—after all those years—make real his love for Putin.

From the start of Trump 2.0, it was obvious that the president viewed the Ukraine war mainly as a nuisance that blocked the path to a beautiful relationship between him and Putin. He doesn’t care about Ukrainian democracy. (He doesn’t care about American democracy.) He doesn’t care about the violation of international laws and norms—or the preservation of a rules-based international order. He wants to dominate what he perceives as an American sphere of influence, as Putin seeks to do in his neck of the woods. What animates him is the possibility of concocting deals and running the world with Putin (with Xi as a third wheel).

But poor Trump was stuck with a status quo in which the United States was expected to maintain its commitments to Ukraine, which included the provision of armaments and intelligence. Trump couldn’t quite toss Zelenskyy and Ukraine overboard. But he repeatedly conveyed the message that he was just not into them. He periodically dressed down Zelenskyy and blamed him for the war. He and his not-ready-for-prime-time negotiators—Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner—kept leaning on Zelenskyy to cut a deal. That meant ceding territory to Putin, even land that Ukraine still controls. That is, reward the fascist aggressor.

Which brings us to recent days. In sync with the diesel deal, Trump has been squeezing Zelenskyy. He said the Ukrainian was responsible for the war. He called on Zelenskyy to leave office. He decried him as a “dictator.” He claimed that Zelenskyy had swindled $350 billion in military assistance out of the United States and falsely stated half of those funds were “missing.” He falsely maintained the United States has provided more funding to Ukraine than Europe has. He suggested Zelenskyy wants to continue the war to “keep the ‘gravy train’ going.”

There has been more than just gum-flapping. The Trump administration apparently paused the sharing of intelligence with Ukraine—which the Ukrainians desperately need to defend against Russia’s missile attacks. Ukraine charged that Elon Musk’s SpaceX imposed new limits on the military-grade Starlink terminals used by Ukrainian forces and, thus, impeded Kyiv’s ability to conduct drone attacks and intercept Russian drones. (Musk says the Pentagon and the White House controlled this; the service was eventually restored.) Trump angrily demanded that Ukraine cease its attacks on Russian oil facilities. (After refraining from such strikes for three days, Zelenskyy defied Trump and said Ukraine would resume these attacks.) Trump proclaimed an “energy ceasefire,” which Putin ignored, and Trump did not press Russia to end its assault on Ukraine’s power grid.

The Trump administration also requested that European countries unfreeze Russian assets impounded after Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and transfer them to an entity that would be overseen by the US government. So Trump could control those funds? What a nice gift it would be to return them to Putin. (The Europeans told Trump to get lost.)

Trump’s argument for the diesel deal is absurd. He and his lieutenants once contended—as a bargaining chip for Russia—that if the war in Ukraine was resolved, an array of opportunities for US-Russian business deals would arise, which is what the Trumpers have cared about the most. Now they say that reaching a business agreement with Putin before any resolution of this horrific conflict will create a path to peace. Their ridiculous position is to hand Putin the carrot first and then see what happens.

Trump has never held Putin responsible for the war. He has repeatedly said that Putin wishes for the war to end, and he asserts the Russian is pursuing peace. This is more than appeasement. Trump has been running a disinformation campaign on Putin’s behalf—while haranguing Zelenskyy as the impediment to peace and now urging his defenestration. With these latest actions, Trump is making it easier for his pal Putin to triumph in Ukraine.

Commentators on Russian state-controlled media get it, and they are hailing Trump. “Well done, Trump,” one of Putin’s pundits proclaimed. “Today he’s on our side!” Though Trump is an erratic fellow capable of changing course, that appears to be an accurate characterization. He’s with Putin.

Asked about Trump taking his relationship with Putin to the next level, Zelenskyy did not hold back: “He speaks about it, openly and loudly, that he loves such people, and he respects such people.” Fact-check: True.  Zelenskyy added, “How can Trump be friends with him? I think that it’s a mistake.”

FT: In a defiant interview with the FT, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Donald Trump had an instinctive affinity for autocrats and the super-wealthy. The Ukrainian president explained his views on the relationship between the US and Russian heads of state

Advertisement

Ten myths about American politics

Trump’s craving to stride the world side by side with Putin has been evident for many years. But Putin’s criminality and barbarity were obstacles. Now Trump has decided to move past that. Vlad is his man. Abandoning Ukraine is not a bothersome price for Trump to pay. He and Putin have been like lovers kept apart for too long. With just over two years left in his reign of madness and facing a likely drubbing in the midterms, Trump has resolved to make his dream a reality. They can be together. That was always the plan. That was always the destiny.

Trump has gotten what he wanted. So, too, has Putin.

By the way, I could use some help with sales for How Russia Won. If you haven’t gotten a copy yet—and want to be part of the effort to spread the truth about Trump and Russia—please do so now.

Play 

Got anything to say about this item—or anything else? Email me at ourland.corn@gmail.com.

Stress Test: The Latest Midterms Madness

Here’s the most recent episode of the new Stress Test podcast that I am cohosting with award-winning video producer Garrison Hayes. Please check it out and subscribe at youtube.com/motherjones or wherever you get your podcasts.

Play 

A brief reminder that you're reading a free promotional version of Our Land. If you appreciate David's smart takes on the news and all the extra features, sign up to start receiving a free 30-day trial of Our Land directly in your inbox.

Start My Free Trial

Dumbass Comment of the Week

Hey, the judges say, don’t mess with the Boss. Fox host Laura Ingraham teed off on Bruce Springsteen, whining about his passionate support of progressive values: “I was a huge Springsteen fan. But I can’t—he’s ruined it for me. He’s just ruined it…If you’re for the working man—he’s supposed to be for the working man—you gotta be for Trump.”

Acyn: Ingraham: I was a huge Springsteen fan. But he has ruined it for me. If you’re for the working man, you gotta be with Trump

It’s rather late to be complaining about Springsteen’s politics. He’s been a champion of progressive causes for decades. As for the working man? Per The Real Economy Blog: “September represents the sixth consecutive month of declining real wages that provides a vivid example of the cost-of-living crisis that is affecting most American households.” By the way, Springsteen has been releasing in segments a film of the last show of his recent tour, during which he regularly denounced Trump and his assault on democracy and the rule of law. The third of four installments came out this week.

Play 

If this were the Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud contest, Trump would run away with the trophy with this observation: “It's amazing. When you stand up here, it’s just like the love. I could say the stupidest things and you’d clap.”

Republicans against Trump: Trump: “It's amazing. When you stand up here, it’s just like the love. I could say the stupidest things and you’d clap.”

It’s not quite the compliment he thinks it is.

On Monday, The New York Times began a story on Trump’s diesel deal with Putin this way.

President Trump's new diplomatic crisis over Ukraine first erupted at Steve Witkoff's exclusive golf club outside Miami on Friday.

Peace envoys? Really, New York Times?

Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), the House majority whip, had the most absurd duck-the-question response. While interviewing Emmer on ABC’s This Week, host Jon Karl noted that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops had opposed livestreaming the coming execution of Nidal Hasan, the convicted Fort Hood shooter, and he asked, “Are you in favor of that idea?” Emmer replied, “Well, personally, I’m not in favor of the death penalty…I am so happy we have a president…who will make a decision…in the best interest of the people. He will hold the criminals and terrorists accountable.”

Aaron Rupar: KARL: This idea of livestreaming an execution -- US Catholic Bishops called it 'a barbaric promotion of culture of death.' Are you in favor?  EMMER: I'm so happy we have a president who will make a decision in the best interest of the people. He will hold the criminals and terrorists accountable.

A Republican opposed to the death penalty could not even bring himself to criticize Trump for endorsing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s decision to broadcast this execution live. Days later, Trump himself flipped and killed the idea. Apparently, he had not realized that Hasan is paralyzed and requires a wheelchair, and he reasonably fretted the optics would not be great.

On Fox News, host Rachel Campos-Duffy (who’s married to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy) cheered on Trump’s latest moves regarding the war in Ukraine and claimed Ukraine has killed “a million kids on the Russian side.”

Aaron Rupar: Rachel Campos-Duffy claims Ukraine has killed

This was ridiculously wrong. Her remark immediately drew a comment on X: “No evidence supports Ukraine killing ‘a million kids’ on the Russian side. UN OHCHR verified ~820 child deaths in Ukraine since 2022 (mostly Russian attacks). Russian officials report hundreds of Russian child casualties.” Once upon a time, it mattered if a television host made such a dopey remark. Now, not at all.

This week—given the Trump mercy rule—the winner was obvious: Trump’s chief suck-up. While speaking at a rally on Tuesday in Tyler, Texas, for GOP Senate candidate, Ken Paxton, Vice President JD Vance responded to a fan: “I love you too, sir. In a totally platonic way, to be clear. I'm the vice president, not James Talarico,” Paxton’s Democratic opponent.

CSPAN: .@VP JD Vance implies U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico (D-TX) is gay:

Has there ever been such a snotty veep? This is Vance acting like a 13-year-old brat who thinks it’s funny to call someone gay. For such juvenile behavior, Vance places first this week. We hope his wife is proud.

Advertisement

Ten myths about American politics

The Mailbag

There was much mail about the issue in which I explained how NPR and The New York Times, to a lesser extent, recently whitewashed the bigotry, conspiracism, extremism, and nuttery of Tucker Carlson.

Steve Pelton wrote:

Excellent piece, David. I am very disappointed in NPR. They act as if they are still beholden to taxpayers for some funding and are still afraid to upset Trump. NPR has been guilty of normalizing Trump throughout this Trump obscenity. Now may I suggest you expose Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) for his complicity in Trump's ruining of our country. As Senate majority leader he has the power to push back, but never has, no matter how outrageous the topic. His WWII war hero dad must be spinning.

Thanks, Steve. Thune, like Mitch McConnell, has a lot to answer for. Then again, no Republican senator has bolted the party and truly rejected Trump and Trumpism. They’re all complicit.

Gregg Barak asked:

So was Carlson’s support for Abdul El-Sayed rather than Mike Rogers a diversion of some kind?

No, I think he probably means it—in the sense he means anything. He's become fiercely anti-Israel and on that point is on El-Sayed's side. But he has not formally endorsed El-Sayed. Mostly, Carlson’s been slamming Rogers for supporting the war in Iran and the Israeli government, and he defended El-Sayed when Rogers’ blasted him for comments critical of the post-9/11 wars. As the saying goes, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Carole Ranco wondered this:

Why would NPR compliment Tucker Carlson? I’m really disappointed. Are they turning right? They’ve been so good at being neutral and sticking to facts.

I don't think NPR is moving right. But NPR has long been afraid of being accused of being too liberal. Thus, it often bends over backward to be fair to the right. And in this case, it went too far by calling Tucker Carlson a “thoughtful” fellow.

Pooky Amsterdam shared this:

Your recent post on Tucker Carlson is informative. He is in my opinion running for the Republican nomination for president. I don't think he will be able to pull off a new third party soon enough. And when are we having our next live OurLanders Zoom?

Hey Pooky, thanks for writing. I've been busy promoting the book and starting the new Stress Test podcast. But we'll have a Zoom get-together soon. As for Carlson, I don't think he has the guts to run.

MoxieCam™

“Why do I have to wear this?”
“To monitor your heart, Moxie. To see if it’s working well.”
“You mean it may not be working well? What happens then? What happens if your heart stops working?”
“Yours will never stop.”

Moxie the dog stands on a patio with a couple of chairs and a swing chair
 

Congratulations, you read all the way to the end! It's a great time to say "I'm in" and start your free 30-day trial. Make sure you don't miss out on what's next: Sign up to start getting Our Land in your inbox each week. We also want to hear from readers (especially those who read the whole thing!). So let us know what you think so far or share something interesting with David at ourland.corn@gmail.com.

Start Receiving Our Land
 

Our Land

This message was sent to example@example.com. To change the messages you receive from us, you can edit your email preferences or unsubscribe from all mailings.

www.MotherJones.com
PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755