There’s something about political conventions that many people may not understand: They are conventions—just like, say, a Shriners convention or a national gathering of realtors.
 
FREE TRIAL VERSION. DON'T MISS OUT.

FREE TRIAL VERSION. DON'T MISS OUT.

FREE TRIAL VERSION. DON'T MISS OUT.

FREE TRIAL VERSION. DON'T MISS OUT.

 

A Remembrance of Democratic Conventions Past

By David Corn  August 20, 2024

Sen. Edward Kennedy declined to pose with President Jimmy Carter for a hands-in-the-air unity photo at the Democratic National Convention in 1980. Bob Daugherty/AP

Sen. Edward Kennedy declined to pose with President Jimmy Carter for a hands-in-the-air unity photo at the Democratic National Convention in 1980. Bob Daugherty/AP

 

You're reading a free promotional version of Our Land, and we hope you enjoy David's exclusive writing and don't want to miss out on what's next. Sign up to start receiving a free 30-day trial of Our Land and check out all of the behind-the-scenes reports and interactive features with each issue.

 

There’s something about political conventions that many people may not understand: They are conventions—just like, say, a Shriners convention or a national gathering of realtors. Thousands of members of the politics-media tribe assemble in search of connections and a good time. There are receptions, parties, conferences, and much meeting and greeting in overflowing hotel bars and lobbies. A tsunami of schmoozing ensues among party officials, journalists, donors, strategists, activists, candidates, elected officials and their aides, delegates, lobbyists, and others, including political tourists who gawk at their favorite media celebs. Contacts are made, gossip is traded. For those in these overlapping worlds, what goes on outside the hall—where often there are few surprises—can be as important as the official proceedings.

This summer, due to a back surgery I’ve mentioned previously, I am skipping both conventions. My titanium rods and pins are still fusing to my bones, and my surgeon has implored me to eschew this rodeo. The shindig underway this week in Chicago is the first Democratic convention I’ve missed in more than four decades. This has put me in a nostalgic frame of mind. Thus, since I am writing this issue prior to the start of the get-together in the City of Big Shoulders and you are receiving it after the kickoff (with President Joe Biden delivering the keynote on the first night), I’m going to share some reflections on the previous Democratic conventions I witnessed. This is hardly meant as a comprehensive history—just some personal remembrances, as I miss out on the hustle and bustle of this year’s gathering.

1980, New York City: My first convention. I don’t remember how, but I managed to wrangle a freelance gig as a cub reporter for Joe Conason and Jim Ridgeway, two columnists then at the Village Voice. The pair were jointly covering the Democrats, who that year had been bitterly divided by Sen. Ted Kennedy’s primary challenge to incumbent President Jimmy Carter. At the start of the week, Kennedy was mounting a last-ditch effort to persuade Carter delegates to jump ship. Though this uprising failed, Kennedy and his allies kept pressing for a more liberal party platform than Carter desired—one that included a major stimulus program and a jobs bill. And there was much concern among Democrats as to whether the party could unite and keep B-movie actor and former California Gov. Ronald Reagan out of the White House. Conason and Ridgeway dispatched me to various events across the Big Apple, where Democrats, liberals, labor activists, and other progressives were gabbing about the platform fight, what Carter would have to do to appeal to the left, and how the party could heal the wound. I filed notes, and, if I remember correctly, a few quotes I collected ended up in their copy. I was ecstatic.

The big moments of that convention included when TMK addressed the delegates and tried to keep the flames of Camelot and liberalism alive (“The cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die”), and when he appeared on the stage with Carter on the last night and Carter chased him in search of that hands-clasped-together-over-heads photo that would signify party unity. Kennedy would not oblige. Happy days were not here again.

The ghost of 1980 hung over the early 2024 campaign for Democrats. The division caused by Kennedy’s bid—and the accepted wisdom that his primary challenge weakened Carter for the general election against Reagan—was much in mind when Ds talked about possible challenges to Biden. Did any Democrat want to run against Biden and, if unsuccessful, make it tougher for Biden to defeat Trump—and be blamed for that? And a coda: Decades later, I ended up working at Mother Jones with Ridgeway, who died in 2021, and this year Conason asked me to provide a blurb for his new book, The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers, and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism. The circle of (media) life.

1984, San Francisco: I attended the convention as a correspondent for the Nation and focused mainly on the issue of arms control. The nuclear freeze movement had emerged two years earlier, and anti-nuclear activists were a potent part of the Democratic coalition and pushed for planks in the platform aimed at reducing nuclear arsenals. But my biggest accomplishment was gaining a pass for a media lounge sponsored by some railroad trade association. This was where free food and beer could be acquired. One night at the lounge, I was befriended by Hunter S. Thompson, who was in full Hunter S. Thompson form: crazed, talking wildly about, well, everything, and thrashing about. At one point, he became so enthused about a point he was making that he waved his arms fiercely, unintentionally threw himself into the curtain that served as a wall, and ended up crashing into the next-door reception. I helped him to his feet and offered apologies to our neighbors that he would not.

This was the evening that the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who had won nearly 20 percent of the delegates during the primaries, was slated to speak. As Jackson was heading toward the stage, Thompson grabbed me and ran toward the convention floor. “I want to see blood!” he shouted, as we hurried along. “I want people at home to be scared as hell!” I don’t believe either of us had floor credentials, and at the entrance to the floor, we rushed past security. (This was pre-9/11.) “Panic—I want to see panic in the streets,” Thompson exclaimed. Around this point, he let go of me. I now have this image of him disappearing into the crowd, yelling “panic” over and over. I never saw him again that convention.

Jackson’s address did not incite the panic in Middle America that Thompson wanted. But he did talk about America as a “quilt” that included “the white, the Hispanic, the Black, the Arab, the Jew, the woman, the Native American, the small farmer, the businessperson, the environmentalist, the peace activist, the young, the old, the lesbian, the gay, and the disabled.” Not even Democrats at this point were accustomed to such statements of inclusion, and no one had ever before mentioned gays or lesbians in a national convention speech.

Few people believed that former Vice President Walter Mondale, the Democratic nominee, could defeat Reagan, and that gave a somewhat dreary tone to the proceedings. (“Mr. Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I,” Mondale said in his acceptance speech. “He won’t tell you. I just did.” Reporters let out a collective “ugh!”) Yet a highlight of the week was a mega-party put on at Fisherman’s Wharf by Willie Brown, the powerful and flamboyant California state assembly speaker. I had never seen such high piles of shrimp and crab legs. Democrats might have been depressed about their electoral prospects, but that night they were high on seafood and free booze—and perhaps other substances. It was a good time on the depressing march toward a blowout.

At that convention, I picked up a useful tip from Victor Navasky, the editor of the Nation. One important task at conventions was to gain entrance to the best parties and receptions. Each morning, a calendar was published listing the events of the day, including invitation-only gatherings. Navasky would identify the parties he wished to attend and call the groups sponsoring them. He would say that he’d like to be placed on the list, and invariably the person on the other end would say something like, “I can’t do that, but I will pass your message along to Susan.” Fine, he would reply. Later, he would show up at the event, and if asked if he was on the list, he would say, “I was told Susan was taking care of it.” Yes, this often worked.

1988, Atlanta: I was then the Washington correspondent for the Nation. It’s hard to believe now how triumphant Democrats were at this get-together. Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis was way ahead in the polls against Vice President George H.W. Bush. When he hit the stage to deliver his acceptance speech, the PA system blared Neil Diamond’s “Coming to America,” a pro-immigration anthem. I doubt anyone can remember anything Dukakis said that night. But in an earlier speech, Texas Gov. Ann Richards brought down the house with her trash-talking of Bush. (“Poor George, he can’t help it—he was born with a silver foot in his mouth.”) The most consequential speech of the week—or so it seemed—came from the young governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton. He droned on and on and on. Toward the end, when he said, “In closing…” the delegates cheered. Afterward, every political pundit said Clinton was toast. This rising star had set.

It's my recollection that after the Clinton speech—though it may have been another night—I was at a party thrown by New York Gov. Mario Cuomo, who had been a Democratic frontrunner that year until, after much hemming and hawing, this Hamlet of Albany declined to enter the race. At the massive soiree, I introduced Julius Genachowski, a future chair of the Federal Communications Commission, to Martha Raddatz, then a young reporter for ABC News. Three years later, they wed. (Eight years after that, they divorced.) At another party, I spotted actor Rob Lowe, who was immersed in a gaggle of young, adoring women. Maybe too young, I thought. In fact, Lowe’s exploits at the convention had been a hot topic of discussion. He was later charged in connection with making a sex tape that week involving a 16-year-old girl he met in Atlanta. (A year after the convention, he signed an agreement with local prosecutors in which he did not admit guilt but agreed to perform 20 hours of community service.)

The Democrats left Atlanta jazzed and brimming with confidence. Subsequently, Bush and his campaign operation—led by Roger Ailes and Lee Atwater—mounted a nasty crusade of personal slander against Dukakis. (Bush allies ran the infamous Willie Horton ad.) This effort would be deemed quaint by today’s standards. Yet at the time it was considered a new low in American politics—and it worked. What we’ve learned since is that there is no bottom.

I’ll end this jaunt down memory lane here, though there are plenty of tales to tell about subsequent Democratic hoedowns. But I’ll add that four years later at the 1992 convention in New York City—during which my car radio was stolen—the Democrats nominated the guy who had been pronounced politically dead by the pundits in Atlanta. No one had figured that Clinton’s good friend, Linda Bloodworth-Thomason, a television producer (Designing Women), would advise him to go on Johnny Carson’s show and make fun of himself for his disastrous speech and find a path to redemption that would lead to the White House. That convention had one of the best balloon drops I’ve seen, as Fleetwood Mac repeatedly reminded us over and over, “Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow.” The tune played multiple times as the Clintons and Gores waved to the hyped-up Democratic throng. I recall thinking: Finally, the first rock ‘n’ roll president, and they couldn’t come up with a better song?

ratio 

Got anything to say about this item—or anything else? Email me at ourland@motherjones.com.

 

A brief reminder that you're reading a free promotional version of Our Land. If you appreciate David's smart takes on the news and all the extra features, sign up to start receiving a free 30-day trial of Our Land directly in your inbox.

Receive Our Land
 

Democracy Dies in the Darkness of Both-Sidesism

As I noted recently, I worry that the conventional media have not learned sufficiently from their mistakes of 2016 that helped ease the way to the White House for Donald Trump. This past weekend, I saw more reason for such fretting. The New York Times ran an article headlined “Assessing Trump’s and Harris’s Attacks on Each Other.” This is how it began: “In the weeks since Vice President Kamala Harris ascended to the top of the Democratic ticket, she and former President Donald J. Trump have each sought to portray the other as extreme and unfit for office.” In other words, they both are doing the same thing. The piece continued:

Mr. Trump has tried out a variety of attack lines on Ms. Harris, such as falsely questioning her racial identity and the sizes of her crowds. The former president has also cast Ms. Harris as a member of the “radical left” by describing her positions and record on immigration, tax policy, climate change and criminal justice — often adding spurious extrapolations to overstate her positions even more.

And then it turned to Harris:

For her part, Ms. Harris has sought to contrast her background as a prosecutor and attorney general with Mr. Trump’s conviction in May for falsifying business records. She has also repeated a number of claims first advanced by President Biden about Mr. Trump’s proposals for social safety nets, health care and abortion, ignoring Mr. Trump’s clarifications and contradictory evidence.

The “for her part” clause reinforced the thrust of the opening: They’re both at it. The article did characterize each effort somewhat differently. Trump was “falsely questioning” and relying on “spurious extrapolations to overstate,” while Harris was contrasting her background with Trump’s felonious conduct and “ignoring” his supposed “clarifications.” In this face-off, as the Times described it, Trump was certainly engaged in more egregious conduct. And the examples the article cited positioned Trump as the bigger liar. Yet the entire framing could allow a reader to shrug and remark, “They all do it.”

This casting works to Trump’s advantage. He is an extremist, and his attempt to steal the 2020 election and mount a coup and his incitement of the January 6 insurrectionist assault on Congress render him unfit to be president. One may not like Harris’ policies and proposals, but by no conventional definition is she an extremist, and nothing in her past makes her unfit to serve as chief executive. Focusing on the finger-pointing and not the ultimate reality is a cheap way out—and benefits the true and dangerous extremist in the race.

The Watch, Read, and Listen List

House of the Dragon. If you have any intention of watching season 2 of the HBO follow-up and prequel to Game of Thrones and don’t want any spoilers, cease reading this now. I am about to give away the big finish of this installment: There is no big finish. The show runners’ decision to spend seven episodes building toward a climax and then not deliver was extremely vexing and disappointing. All the forces that have been unleased through the first two seasons are poised for a titanic battle. We see dragons in the air, war ships at sea, armies on the march. The brush is dry. Multiple matches are lit. Here comes a helluva fight. One for the ages. Then…cut to closing credits and a long, long wait.

There were 20 months between the end of the first season and the start of the most recent one. And now viewers have been mega-teased, set up for a cataclysmic conflict that may or may not come for almost two years. Note to HBO execs: This is not how you treat loyal fans.

This letdown aside, the second season was a vast improvement on the first. The initial outing covered almost two decades and was overly devoted to exposition to establish the driving conflict of the series—a succession dispute. It’s about 200 years before the events covered in Game of Thrones. King Viserys I of the dragon-riding Targaryen clan has anointed his daughter Rhaenyra his heir—defying the men-should-rule presumption. But his latest wife, Alicient, claims that on his deathbed Viserys changed his mind and designated the son she had with him, Aegon, the next king. By the way, Rhaenyra and Alicient were childhood BFFs. So, awkward. Alicient’s play divides the court and the entire kingdom. Hijinks and assorted killings ensue.

Season 2 zeroes in on the conflict between the two houses. Aegon sits on the Iron Throne in the capital city of Westeros, and Rhaenyra and her loyalists are in exile. The Westeros bunch have more men under arms. Rhaenyra has more dragons. A bloody war in which thousands will die seems unavoidable, though neither Rhaenyra nor Alicient wish it to happen.

House of the Dragon lacks key elements that made GoT such a winner. There are far fewer engaging characters. The bad guys in House of the Dragon are less interesting than the villains of the original. And the main players are less compelling than, say, the Lannister siblings of Game of Thrones (the incestuous Cersai and Jamie and their soulful brother Tyrion). Yes, Rhaenyra has been wronged. But it’s much harder to care about the warring Targaryens than the schemers and connivers who come centuries later.

House of the Dragon is most intriguing as a metaphor for our nuclear age. In this Targaryen era, dragons are the weapons that can destroy all. Rhaenyra wants to exploit hers as a deterrent force against those who have usurped her. She hopes to wield the threat of dragon warfare to force her foes into handing her back the crown. But her advisers argue that dragon power only matters if you are willing to use them. If your rivals don’t believe you will push the button, they are not going to bend the knee. It’s quite the conundrum for the princess who yearns to avoid bloodshed and the deaths of the many “smallfolk” who will bear the brunt of war. What will she do? We won’t know for a long time.

ratio 

Zero Visibility Possible, Nina Burleigh. Seven years ago, a twice-divorced 64-year-old retired real estate businessman took a room in the Mandalay Bay hotel on the Las Vegas strip and opened fire on a country music festival, killing 60 people and wounding more than 400, before shooting himself dead. It was the deadliest mass shooting by a single gunman in US history. To this day, we don’t know why he did this. My pal Nina Burleigh, an accomplished journalist and author, uses this tragedy as the start of a rip-roaring novel that explores the failures of modern-day media and the perils of misinformation. Zero Visibility Possible follows several journalists—who exhibit varying commitments to integrity and the truth—as they try to piece together why that horrific event occurred. They all happen to work for an online website that has seen better days and that now appears to be owned by a cult that could be connected to a cryptocurrency operation. (Burleigh seems to have been thinking about the recent ownership history of the once-venerable Newsweek.) With former intel operatives and current disinformation agents in the mix, the reporters confront assorted conspiracy theories and conspiracies, as the truth turns out to be a tail-eating snake. Is this novel satire? A roman-à-clef-ish poke at Burleigh’s own profession? Pynchon meets All the President’s Men? It never stops spinning.

 

Congratulations, you read all the way to the end! It's a great time to say "I'm in" and start your free 30-day trial. Make sure you don't miss out on what's next: Sign up to start getting Our Land in your inbox each week. We also want to hear from readers (especially those who read the whole thing!). So let us know what you think so far or share something interesting with David at ourland@motherjones.com.

Start Receiving Our Land
 

Our Land

This message was sent to example@example.com. To change the messages you receive from us, you can edit your email preferences or unsubscribe from all mailings.

www.MotherJones.com
PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755