If you’re not familiar with term “stochastic terrorism,” now is a good time to bone up, for the leading Republican candidate is a stochastic terrorist.
 
Our Land

A NEWSLETTER FROM DAVID CORN

Our Land

A NEWSLETTER FROM DAVID CORN

 

Donald Trump, Stochastic Terrorist

By David Corn  September 27, 2023

Donald Trump campaigning in North Charleston, South Carolina, on September 25, 2023. Artie Walker Jr./AP

Donald Trump campaigning in North Charleston, South Carolina, on September 25, 2023. Artie Walker Jr./AP

If you’re not familiar with term “stochastic terrorism,” now is a good time to bone up, for the leading Republican candidate is a stochastic terrorist.

 

Stochastic terrorism is defined by conflict and law enforcement experts as the demonization of a foe so that he, she, or they might become targets of violence. Scientific American recently put it this way:

 

Dehumanizing and vilifying a person or group of people can provoke what scholars and law enforcement officials call stochastic terrorism, in which ideologically driven hate speech increases the likelihood that people will violently and unpredictably attack the targets of vicious claims. At its core, stochastic terrorism exploits one of our strongest and most complicated emotions: disgust.

 

In addition to disgust, fear and hatred can work, the point being to depict a person or set of people as a loathsome other undeserving of respect or acceptance, and a dangerous threat. Establishing such a framework boosts the odds that a lone individual or group will violently assault the deprecated.

 

Last year, after the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s Florida residence, in search of stolen classified documents, an Ohio Trump devotee named Ricky Shiffer, wearing tactical gear and armed with an AR-15, tried to breach the FBI field office in Cincinnati. He failed and fled, and later died in a shootout with law enforcement. Noting that far-right Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), a leading election denialist, after the raid, had declared, “We must destroy the FBI,” my colleague Mark Follman wrote:

 

Was Shiffer spurred to attack the FBI by the statements from Trump and Gosar? It’s hard to know, and that’s no accident. Shiffer’s actions point to a rhetorical method experts call “stochastic terrorism,” whereby a leader vilifies a person or group in ways likely to instigate random supporters to attack those targets, while the instigator maintains a veneer of plausible deniability. Trump made this form of incitement a hallmark of his presidency, galvanizing extremists by railing against and dehumanizing his “enemies.” The country saw the devastating consequences when his supporters stormed Congress to obstruct certification of the presidential election.

 

Of course, there have long been many instances of Trump encouraging political violence. Axios has compiled a list. As has ABC News. And Vox. And the New York Times. Often, it’s been tough-guy bluster, with Trump telling law officers to handle suspects roughly, pledging to shoot looters, or saying to attendees at his rally that it’s okay to beat up protestors. Stochastic terrorism is more indirect and perhaps more effective: It’s pinning a bull’s-eye on the back of an opponent in a volatile situation—perhaps suggesting the world would be safer without this supposed threat—knowing this could lead to violence against that target. It’s indirect incitement, inspiring someone else to do the dirty work.

 

Trump is a master of this. After all, he got thousands of his cultists to storm the Capitol and try to prevent the congressional certification of his loss to Joe Biden. In recent days, he has fired up his stochastic terrorism machine. In a Rosh Hashanah messaged posted on social media earlier this month, Trump railed against “liberal Jews”: “Just a quick reminder for liberal Jews who voted to destroy America & Israel because you believed in false narratives! Let’s hope you learned from your mistake & make better choices moving forward!”

 

This holiday greeting came as antisemitism appears to be on the rise, and it certainly carried a menacing tone, suggesting that liberal Jews—who are a majority of Jews—are enemies of the United States. It is not hard to imagine that a deranged person contemplating an attack on a synagogue would read this post as a green light.

 

Trump was far more explicit in a recent post on Army Gen. Mark Milley, who is about to step down as chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He denounced Milley for the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan (an action that Trump had set in motion) and called him a “Woke train wreck.” Trump assailed Milley for talking to his Chinese counterpart in the final turbulent weeks of the Trump presidency (which Milley said he did in coordination with other senior defense officials to assure China that Trump was not planning a surprise attack on China).

 

Trump called this a “treasonous” step and “an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH!” Once more, it is not difficult to envision a Trump fanatic seeing this as a call to assassinate Milley. He might as well have exclaimed, “Will no one rid me of this turbulent Milley?” And with Milley a possible witness against Trump in the stolen documents case, this post might also have been an attempt at witness intimidation. (Gosar also implied Milley should be put to death, writing in his weekly newsletter, “In a better society, quislings like the strange sodomy-promoting General Milley would be hung.”

 

Days later, Trump condemned NBC News and MSNBC—and their corporate owner, Comcast—for committing “Country Threatening Treason” with their critical and “vicious” coverage of him. He threatened to investigate them should he regain the White House. I assume NBC News and MSNBC reviewed their security procedures after this. (Interest declared: I am an MSNBC contributor.)

 

Accusing a person or entity of treason is essentially saying that they deserve execution. That sends quite the message to Trump’s supporters, especially the unhinged ones. And we already know that they can be a violent bunch and follow his not-so-subtle hints to target his opponents (and to beat up cops).

 

Trump is hardly alone in deploying this form of terrorism. Last week, billionaire Xer Elon Musk tweeted, “The Soros organization appears to want nothing less than the destruction of western civilization.” Given that billionaire philanthropist George Soros has long been the target of antisemitic attacks, antisemitic conspiracy theories, and at least one assassination attempt, that Musk himself has previously mounted an antisemitic attack on Soros, and that Musk’s X platform has been credibly accused of hosting an increase in antisemitic posts, one might expect Musk to be a bit careful here. But…no. Musk didn’t call for violence to be waged against Soros, yet by characterizing Soros as seeking the “destruction of western civilization,” he hyperbolically presents Soros as an existential threat to the United States and the entire Western world. Now what should one do about such a threat?

 

As Follman noted, many Republicans have followed Trump’s lead in deploying extreme rhetoric that could spur violence:

 

After Mar-a-Lago, Trump allies claimed that the feds were coming for the MAGA base next. If the FBI can do this to him, they inveighed on social media and Fox News, just imagine what they could do to you. Ditto with their response to new funding boosting the ranks of the dilapidated IRS. This represents a stark reversal for the GOP: Whereas President George H.W. Bush once renounced the National Rifle Association for disparaging federal agents as “jack-booted thugs,” Republican senators now wield such rhetoric. “Stop Biden’s shadow army of 87,000 IRS agents,” Ted Cruz warned. Chuck Grassley insinuated that an IRS “strike force” could show up with assault weapons “ready to shoot some small business person in Iowa.”

 

At a rally last year, GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has been trying to out-Trump Trump, said of Dr. Anthony Fauci, “I’m just sick of seeing him. Someone needs to grab that little elf and chuck him across the Potomac.” With much conflict and disagreement still prompted by the Covid pandemic, DeSantis was legitimizing the idea of committing violence against Fauci. The crowd roared with approval.

 

Trump, Musk, DeSantis, Gosar—they all know they are speaking to or tweeting at people who are angry and riled up. The brush is dry, and they are suggesting where a match should be lit. In August 2022, Follman attended a threat-assessment conference where leaders in the field told him they were deeply alarmed by the tense national atmosphere: “While far-left rhetoric has stirred some violent protests and threats, they said, plots and attacks fueled by Trump’s incitement and MAGA extremism are by far the driving concern.”

 

With Trump under indictment in four cases—for a variety of allegations, including treasonous actions, stealing classified government documents, and making hush money payoffs to a porn star—and lashing out, threats of violence are increasing. The New York Times summed up recent developments: a woman called the chamber of the judge overseeing the federal election interference case against Trump and said, “We are coming to kill you”; FBI agents are worried about threats to their families; and top prosecutors in the cases require round-the-clock protection. The bottom line: “As the prosecutions of Mr. Trump have accelerated, so too have threats against law enforcement authorities, judges, elected officials and others. The threats, in turn, are prompting protective measures, a legal effort to curb his angry and sometimes incendiary public statements, and renewed concern about the potential for an election campaign in which Mr. Trump has promised ‘retribution’ to produce violence.”

 

On Monday, Trump visited a gun store in South Carolina, and his campaign posted on X that he had purchased a Glock pistol. With his indictments, it would likely be illegal for the store to sell him a firearm, and the campaign quickly deleted the post, noting that he had admired the gun but not bought it. All this could be read as another violence-triggering signal to his supporters. This store that Trump promoted supplied one of the weapons used in the racist shooting last month at a Dollar General store in Jacksonville, Florida.

 

Trump and the GOP continue to get away with their encouragement of violence. Why wasn’t his post suggesting Milley be executed major news for a week, provoking controversy and forcing every Republican to respond? The answer is obvious: Trump’s extremism has become fully normalized. It’s Trump being Trump. When he endorses the nutty and dangerous QAnon conspiracy theory, when he says the Constitution should be suspended so he can be reinstated as president, when he dines with a white nationalist and a prominent antisemite—none of this prompts lasting national outrage that transcends the usual tribal partisan politics.

 

Then again, why should it? Trump has done worse. He has (so far) gotten away both with trying to mount a coup and with inciting a violent riot that he hoped to exploit to stay in power—at least insofar as he’s the odds-on favorite to snag the Republican nomination. And despite all that, he’s often treated by much of the mainstream media as a politician, not a peril. Yet for the security of American democracy, Trump needs to be widely seen for what he is: this stochastic terrorist. The more he vilifies his detractors, the more he assaults the justice system, the more likely there will be more violence. He knows this, and that is the point.

 

Got anything to say about this item—or anything else? Email me at ourland@motherjones.com.

A Big American Psychosis Sale—Today!

My publisher has been offering to Our Land subscribers the new and expanded paperback version of my bestselling American Psychosis: A Historical Investigation of How the Republican Party Went Crazy at a 10 percent discount. But, as previously noted, there have been a bunch of glitches with the link for the deal. (Don’t get me started.) If you tried to order and it did not work, I apologize. Now we have a better way for readers of this newsletter to buy the book at an even deeper discount: 25 percent off. Yes, 25 percent off. Operators are standing by. Okay, not really. But if you use this link for Books a Million, you can take advantage of this special deal. But do it now. This offer is only good today and tomorrow. By the way, I had a good chat about the book and what it tells us about the current political mess with political strategist Rachel Bitecofer for her podcast.

American Psychosis, by David Corn

The Watch, Read, and Listen List

“I Should’ve Danced More,” Joan Osborne. Joan Osborne has always been a bluesy, sing-from-the-gut vocalist. But her first major-label debut, released in 1995, became a smash, Grammy-nominated album because of the poppier hit, “One of Us.” It was a monster tune about God—and nothing sappy. (“What if God was one of us? / Just a slob like one of us / Just a stranger on the bus / Tryin' to make his way home?”) A great song but not an accurate representation of her work, it launched her into stardom. Rather than duplicate that pop super-success, she went on to mount a long and (I hope for her) rewarding career, performing with Motown musicians, Mavis Staples, and remnants of the Grateful Dead. She earned a Grammy nomination for best blues album in 2012. She’s been plugging away producing soulful music for three decades.

 

Last month, Osborne released on her own Womanly Hips label her 13th album, Nobody Owns You. That seems an apt title to capture her independent-minded career. One track off the album is a haunting song of regret, “I Should’ve Danced More”—a look back at missed opportunities. It oozes melancholy but with an it’s-not-too-late defiance. With her stellar run, I hope Osborne has not accumulated too many disappointments.

ratio 

Invasion. This Apple TV+ offering is perhaps the most frustrating series I’ve watched. I admit it: I am a sucker for alien invasion films and shows. Perhaps many of us are because they take on one of the most fundamental questions: Are we alone in this ginormous universe? There are 200 billion trillion stars besides the Sun. (That’s 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.) It’s hard to believe there ain’t something out there—though the distances are so great it’s unlikely we will ever find out. (I don’t believe we’ve been visited by UFO aliens, even though as a kid I had my own UFO experience.) Yet contemplating the question of extraterrestrial life is really a matter of pondering the nature of life itself and (supposedly) intelligent life, as we know it. Are we a fluke? A random chain of trillions and trillions of events that led to the creation of self-conscious, sentient beings who can write and read email newsletters?

 

All these they-came-from-beyond flicks and shows address the basic stuff of human existence. Done well, they get us thinking. Invasion could do that if it weren’t so exasperating. I can’t recall watching a slower paced action series. In this retelling of a familiar story, aliens invade Earth, and there are four narratives: a Long Island mom, who dropped out of med school, takes to the road to protect her two young kids and discovers a shard of alien material, which (obviously) might be the key to defeating them; a US soldier survives a battle with the killer spikey-shaped bad guys and becomes obsessed with uncovering the big secret behind the invasion, which (obviously) might be the key to defeating them; a British schoolboy with epilepsy finds he can telepathically communicate with the aliens, which (obviously) might be the key to defeating them; and a Japanese engineer whose astronaut girlfriend was captured (or absorbed by) the aliens also discovers she can make contact with them, which (obviously) might be the key to defeating them.

 

So far, so good. But the narrative proceeds languidly, as the show drags from one plot line to the next. Worse, a lot doesn’t make sense. How does the world establish a super-UN global government in weeks? Where actually are the aliens? How many are there? We barely see them. There are few battles shown. How does the Long Island mom drive across the country from New York to the Northwest without encountering aliens, though she passes through scenes of devastation? Parts of the world are decimated by the invasion; others are not. There’s no explanation. The show, now in its second season, is annoying.

 

Why do I watch? I don’t know. Closure, maybe. I kind of want to know who these aliens are and what’s their agenda. (The killer spikey things seem to be the foot soldiers for some advanced intelligent life that looks like animated Jell-O.) Do the producers of the show have a grand idea to share with us? I’m waiting to see. But if there’s no payoff by the end of Season 2, I’m done. An alien invasion should not take so long to deliver its message.

ratio 

Read Recent Issues of Our Land

September 23, 2023: Joe Biden and Saudi Arabia: What the heck?; a killer attack ad for abortion rights; an apology for Chile; Dumbass Comment of the Week (Rep. Victoria Spartz); the Mailbag; MoxieCam™; and more.

 

September 19, 2023: The threat of Cornel West; Nils Lofgren sings about truth; Gus Russo deconstructs the latest JFK assassination revelation (or is it?); and more.

 

September 16, 2023: Can the media meet the challenge of the GOP’s bogus impeachment?; why Mitt Romney should read American Psychosis; Dumbass Comment of the Week (Tim Gurner); the Mailbag: MoxieCam™; and more.

 

September 12, 2023: The right-wing authoritarian threat beyond Trump (Project 2025); American Psychosis and C-SPAN; Barbie and the corporate exploitation of exploitation; the Rolling Stones’ stereotypical “Angry”; and more.

 

September 9, 2023: A story too immense (Rudy Giuliani and Russia)?; Dumbass Comment of the Week (Tucker Carlson); the Mailbag; MoxieCam™; and more.

 

September 6, 2023: One of the best books I’ve ever read; the Mailbag; Full Circle offers a fascinating neo-noir trip; and more.

 

September 1, 2023: Can Donald Trump rally be barred from the 2024 ballot?; Dumbass Comment of the Week (Tucker Carlson): the Mailbag; Jade Bird and LP belt it out (separately); and more.

 

August 26, 2023: The bottomless cynicism of Tucker Carlson; the Mailbag; MoxieCam™; and more.

 

August 23, 2023: David Brooks’ blind spot; American Psychosis, the paperback; whatever happened to our service economy?; the Mailbag; Citizen Cope takes a “Victory March”; and more.

Got suggestions, comments, complaints, tips related to any of the above, or anything else? Email me at ourland@motherjones.com.

Our Land

This message was sent to example@example.com. To change the messages you receive from us, you can edit your email preferences or unsubscribe from all mailings.

www.MotherJones.com
PO Box 8539, Big Sandy, TX 75755